ext_17485: (Default)
calapine ([identity profile] calapine.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] carmen_lj 2009-11-20 10:08 pm (UTC)

No, she'd have been Queen no matter who she married. It could've provoked a civil war (hence why she wasn't really keen on marrying an Englishman) but the act of marriage in and of itslef would in no way affect her legal claim to the throne or her status as Queen Regnant.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting