Things I Learned Today:
Sep. 29th, 2009 09:21 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Rape is okay so long as you are a rich and successful filmmaker.
At least according to the people signing this petition asking for the release of Roman Polanski.
Fucking hell.
The wording of the petition is as disgusting as the sentiment:
His arrest follows an American arrest warrant dating from 1978 against the filmmaker, in a case of morals.
"Case of morals" is the cool new term for rape, I take it. And it's the rape of a thirteen year old girl. So it's irrelevent whether she consented or not (she didn't).
It seems inadmissible to them that an international cultural event, paying homage to one of the greatest contemporary filmmakers, is used by the police to apprehend him.
HOW DARE THOSE SNEAKY POLICE TURN UP TO ARREST HIM SOMEWHERE WHERE THEY KNEW HE'D BE? Next they'll be, like, investigating crimes and searching for evidence and stuff. WHERE WILL THIS MADNESS END?
By their extraterritorial nature, film festivals the world over have always permitted works to be shown and for filmmakers to present them freely and safely, even when certain States opposed this.
Which they can do, as far as I'm aware, it's just that, for some MAD REASON filmmakers are not always above the law. (I mean the history of this case is pretty oh-dear-god, but making out it is a GROSS INJUSTICE when someone is arrested for a crime they've been convicted of and not served the sentence, and then committed several more crimes to escape is A BIT MAD.)
The arrest of Roman Polanski in a neutral country, where he assumed he could travel without hindrance, undermines this tradition: it opens the way for actions of which no-one can know the effects.
Yes, dammit! If you're on the run from the law and you can't be safe in Switzerland, where can you be safe?!
And I think we can guess the effects: if people, even filmmakers, commit a crime, they may actually be arrested, even by the Swiss. HORRORS.
This extradition, if it takes place, will be heavy in consequences and will take away his freedom.
And why will it take away his freedom? OH YEAH, CAUSE HE DONE A RAPE.
Filmmakers, actors, producers and technicians - everyone involved in international filmmaking - want him to know that he has their support and friendship.
I fucking well hope not, or I'll never be able to watch a movie again.
If only in the name of this friendship between our two countries, we demand the immediate release of Roman Polanski.
PS. What is this rule of law of which you speak?
(I'm aware of the victim's desire just to not want to deal with any of this any more, but the criminal law is there to serve justice, not the victim, and however much one sympathises with her, it's hardly in the interests of a just and safe society to turn a blind eye to rapists and bail-jumpers.)
At least according to the people signing this petition asking for the release of Roman Polanski.
Fucking hell.
The wording of the petition is as disgusting as the sentiment:
His arrest follows an American arrest warrant dating from 1978 against the filmmaker, in a case of morals.
"Case of morals" is the cool new term for rape, I take it. And it's the rape of a thirteen year old girl. So it's irrelevent whether she consented or not (she didn't).
It seems inadmissible to them that an international cultural event, paying homage to one of the greatest contemporary filmmakers, is used by the police to apprehend him.
HOW DARE THOSE SNEAKY POLICE TURN UP TO ARREST HIM SOMEWHERE WHERE THEY KNEW HE'D BE? Next they'll be, like, investigating crimes and searching for evidence and stuff. WHERE WILL THIS MADNESS END?
By their extraterritorial nature, film festivals the world over have always permitted works to be shown and for filmmakers to present them freely and safely, even when certain States opposed this.
Which they can do, as far as I'm aware, it's just that, for some MAD REASON filmmakers are not always above the law. (I mean the history of this case is pretty oh-dear-god, but making out it is a GROSS INJUSTICE when someone is arrested for a crime they've been convicted of and not served the sentence, and then committed several more crimes to escape is A BIT MAD.)
The arrest of Roman Polanski in a neutral country, where he assumed he could travel without hindrance, undermines this tradition: it opens the way for actions of which no-one can know the effects.
Yes, dammit! If you're on the run from the law and you can't be safe in Switzerland, where can you be safe?!
And I think we can guess the effects: if people, even filmmakers, commit a crime, they may actually be arrested, even by the Swiss. HORRORS.
This extradition, if it takes place, will be heavy in consequences and will take away his freedom.
And why will it take away his freedom? OH YEAH, CAUSE HE DONE A RAPE.
Filmmakers, actors, producers and technicians - everyone involved in international filmmaking - want him to know that he has their support and friendship.
I fucking well hope not, or I'll never be able to watch a movie again.
If only in the name of this friendship between our two countries, we demand the immediate release of Roman Polanski.
PS. What is this rule of law of which you speak?
(I'm aware of the victim's desire just to not want to deal with any of this any more, but the criminal law is there to serve justice, not the victim, and however much one sympathises with her, it's hardly in the interests of a just and safe society to turn a blind eye to rapists and bail-jumpers.)
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:48 pm (UTC)I don't understand!
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:50 pm (UTC)But yeah, that petition is just wrong.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:56 pm (UTC)Plus he's rich and famous, so, yeah.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:56 pm (UTC)Pedro Almodovar signed this thing? Tilda Swinton? SALMAN FUCKING RUSHDIE?
(Okay, I get why Rushdie did it; extradition laws kept him safe from the fatwa. But there's using extradition laws to keep someone safe from religious persecution and then there's using them to keep someone safe from being punished for a RAPE. WHICH I'M PRETTY SURE IS ILLEGAL IN FRANCE AND SWITZERLAND, TOO.)
Just...ugh. Fuck 'em all. I like to think rapists should be punished for their crimes, but then I'm only a silly moviegoing proletarian. I couldn't possibly understand.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 08:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:08 pm (UTC)I know the victim says she feels more victimized by the media than Polanski, but that says more about the media's treatment of survivors than it does about the legal system. The media should have left her alone and should never have published her name. Nevertheless, the rapist who fled justice is the only person responsible for delaying closure for 30 plus years.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:37 pm (UTC)Well, I used to respect them, anyway.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:57 pm (UTC)i don't know if the extradition is actually going to serve justice in any meaningful way, given the nature of the justice system, the fact that polanski has already spent decades being a rich, respected film maker, the fact that his victim just doesn't want to deal with the situation anymore, etc -- but being outraged that a convicted child-rapist and bail-jumper has actually been extradited in order to serve his time, because you know him, or he makes "great art"? no. just, no.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:47 pm (UTC)Ahem. This - this probably shouldn't surprise me and yet it does. It's just so blunt.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:52 pm (UTC)Hollywood and the film world don't give two shits what happened to a young girl so long as the important white man gets off scot-free, and anyway she was asking for it and it wasn't his fault. News at 11.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:54 pm (UTC)I'm disgusted by the film industry right now.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 09:56 pm (UTC)I've ranted way too many times about this case, including in a journal entry I posted about 2 minutes ago, but seriously, fuck you, entertainment industry. Except Luc Besson, who actually said that justice applies equally to all people and that includes Roman Polanski.
He raped a 13-year-old. He raped a 13-year-old. He raped a 13-year-old. How can they fly straight from that to calling it a "case of morals", like this is just American prudishness rearing its ugly head? If that's sexual repression, sign me up.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 10:04 pm (UTC)Oh thank criminy. I was worried I was going to have to throw out my Fifth Element DVD.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 10:01 pm (UTC)o_O I have VERY serious doubts the whole of France would be on board in supporting kiddie rapists in the name of art. Stop trying to make this some international incident you ignorant assholes! It's about human decency and this guy isn't only guilty but admitted it, then ran off like the coward he is knowing how guilty he was.
Maybe I'm not an artiste so I just don't get it, but are these dangerously blase petitioners going to lose that much sleep because the director of "The Pianist" is (rightly!) behind bars? This makes me weep for all the brilliant talent out there that can barely get their feet in the door and, you know, don't drug and rape children. All the time and resources being squandered on this asshole. I think I'm going to have the taste of bile in my mouth the rest of the night.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-29 11:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 03:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 11:15 am (UTC)Personally, I would find it easier to forgive the people who signed it if they were ignorant of the facts and signed out of that sort of severely misplaced attempts at solidarity. Lazy, ignorant stupidity is a lot less damning than thinking celebrities should be above the law and/or being okay with the rape of young girls.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 07:33 am (UTC)This is my only reaction because it is the only possible reaction that does not involve MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF HORROR AND RAGE.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 12:53 pm (UTC)Worse - my French is v dodgy, so I may be wrong here, but the actual word used is 'mœurs' which I believe connotates something closer to 'mores' or 'manners'.
Like I say, correct me if I'm wrong, but ew.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 01:51 pm (UTC)'Moeurs' can also be translated as sexual morals or individual sexual behaviour / attitude towards sex.
'Une affaire de mœurs' is massively icky either way. Unless rape counts as 'just sex' in France...
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 02:59 pm (UTC)...okay, it's one of the things that really pisses me off about it.